哪来的"CRM软件形同虚设"?

　　今天(3/5/03)在网上传播的报道 "Gartner调查：CRM软件形同虚设"(见以下附件一)的标题很张扬, 当然也就吸引眼球. 给读者的感觉是所谓的CRM软件名不符实. 既然是虚设, 当然应该撤掉了. 事实上, 该文英文原文的标题是" CRM: Software or shelfware?" (见附件二), 讲的是有不少公司, 买了CRM软件后并没有开始使用, 完全不牵涉到CRM的软件本身的功能问题. 之所以还没使用, 原作者列举了以下几种原因(我归纳并排列):

1. 用户正在安装, 而这一过程可能要化一年甚至更长时间

CRM: Software or shelfware?

By Alorie Gilbert
CNET News.com
March 4, 2003, 4:19 AM PT

When it comes to customer relationship management software, much of what businesses purchase is never put to use, according to a new study.

A survey of nearly 700 companies conducted by research firm Gartner indicates that 42 percent of CRM software licenses purchased have yet to be installed. Gartner intends to publish the results of the survey this week at its CRM software conference in Chicago.

One caveat is that some of the respondents may intend to use more licenses eventually but still are installing the software, a process that can take a year or more. But the results, according to Gartner analyst Esteban Kolsky, reflect a trend many analysts have observed recently: A lot of CRM software that's sold ends up sitting idly on buyers' shelves.

The Gartner survey is the most recent in a string of reports questioning the effectiveness of CRM software, a $3 billion market lead by Siebel Systems, SAP, Oracle, PeopleSoft and Epiphany. The software makers tout CRM as a tool to help companies save money and boost customer loyalty, because it's designed to streamline corporate sales, marketing and call center activities.

CRM was a hot growth area in the business applications market in the late 1990s, but sales among the leading providers have declined amid the depressed economy. Gartner predicts that sales will remain flat this year, and its latest findings aren't likely to make the job of selling CRM applications any easier. But the real losers in all of this, Kolsky said, are the companies who sank millions of dollars into technology they never used.

The reasons for the wasted spending are varied, according to Kolsky. One cause is the aggressive discounting practices in the software industry, he said. Software companies often encourage customers to buy more licenses than they may initially need by offering large volume discounts. If some buyers never use all the software they purchased, they may feel that, with the discount, it was still worth it. But those companies often fail to factor in the higher maintenance fees, which can add up to nearly a fourth of the license cost per seat, he said. Under some software contracts, companies are required to continue paying maintenance fees annually for several years whether they use the software or not, he added.

Other reasons CRM software often goes to waste, Kolsky said, include the resistance to change and new technology among workers. Declining technology budgets at many companies also have drained the corporate coffers of funding for the consulting services needed to install the applications. Companies spend one to five times as much on CRM consulting as they do on software licenses, Kolsky said. Another possibility is that companies have cut their work force as a result of the economic recession and simply have less people on staff to use the software.

Not surprisingly, news of the Gartner survey elicited a fresh round of finger-pointing among CRM rivals.

"This is the fallout of old-line CRM vendors, like Siebel, that oversold and under-delivered," said Brad Wilson, vice president of marketing for PeopleSoft's CRM unit.

Siebel representatives were not immediately available to comment.

本文由作者向CTI论坛提供